Fire Authorising Engineer
Estimated value
£230k
Awarded value
—
Suppliers
0
Lots
1
Published
21 May 2026
Description
Provision of Fire AE Services
Scope
- Reference
- 6998/27
- Total value
- £230,000 excluding VAT£276,000 including VATAbove the relevant threshold
- Commercial tool
- Standalone contract
- Contract dates
- 09 Aug 2026 to 09 Aug 2031Possible extension to 09 Aug 2033
12+ 12
- Main category
- services
- CPV classifications
- 71317100
- Particular suitability
- Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME)Voluntary, community and social enterprises (VCSE)
Award criteria
Criteria the buyer will use to evaluate bids.
| Name | Description | Type | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Point scoring 0-4 Matrix | Score Classification 0 Unacceptable No response at all or insufficient information provided in the response such that it is totally un-assessable and/or incomprehensible. 1 Poor A poor response that either: - Fails to address the majority of the question; or - Addresses the majority/all of the question but with little or no relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in respect of the majority/ all applicable areas, and as a result, the Authority has little confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the Services in compliance with the Specification. 2 Satisfactory A satisfactory response that either: - Addresses all of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has satisfactory confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 3 Good A good response that either: - Addresses all of the question with some good (but not excellent) relevant detail, but this does not cause concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with excellent relevant detail provided and the parts of the question not addressed do not cause the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with good relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in a minority of applicable areas but neither failure causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has good confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 4 Excellent An excellent response that addresses all of the question, with clear and excellent relevant detail giving the Authority full confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. | quality | 70.00% |
| 5 point scoring method 0-4 matrix | Score Classification 0 Unacceptable No response at all or insufficient information provided in the response such that it is totally un-assessable and/or incomprehensible. 1 Poor A poor response that either: - Fails to address the majority of the question; or - Addresses the majority/all of the question but with little or no relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in respect of the majority/ all applicable areas, and as a result, the Authority has little confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the Services in compliance with the Specification. 2 Satisfactory A satisfactory response that either: - Addresses all of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has satisfactory confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 3 Good A good response that either: - Addresses all of the question with some good (but not excellent) relevant detail, but this does not cause concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with excellent relevant detail provided and the parts of the question not addressed do not cause the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with good relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in a minority of applicable areas but neither failure causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has good confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 4 Excellent An excellent response that addresses all of the question, with clear and excellent relevant detail giving the Authority full confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. | cost | 30.00% |
Participation
Conditions suppliers must meet to bid.
Must be registered on the central digital platform. UK GDPR in place at time of contract. AE (Fire Safety) services shall comply with, but not be limited to, the latest edition of the following standards:- • Building Regulations • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Electricity Act 1989 • Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 • Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008 • BS7671, The IEE Wiring Regulations • British Standards and BS Code of Practice • Health & Safety at Work Act • Health Technical Memoranda • Health Building Notes • Health Facilities Notes • Model Engineering Specifications
Health Technical Memorandum - HTM 00 and HTM’s 05-01, 02 and 03. Chartered Engineer Status. ISO9001 accredited ISO 14001 accredited
Submission & procedure
- Enquiry deadline
- 05 Jun 2026, 11:00 am
- Submission deadline
- 16 Jun 2026, 11:00 am
- Submission address
- https://atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗
- Electronic submission
- Yes
- Procedure
- Open procedure