SCG / SCOPAC Coastal & Flood Works Framework 2027
Estimated value
£75.0m
Awarded value
—
Suppliers
0
Lots
3
Published
08 Jul 2026
Description
Portsmouth City Council ('the council') on behalf of the Southern Coastal Group (SCG) and SCOPAC (Standing Conference on Problem Associated with the Coast), is inviting expressions of interest from suitably qualified contractors for inclusion onto a multi-contractor Coastal & Flood Works Framework Agreement. This framework will replace the existing SCG Minor Works Framework that is due to expire on 30th November 2026. The Council s aiming to commence the framework from March 2027 which will run for a period of four years, with an option to extend for a further 2 years in increments to be agreed. The framework will comprise of 3 lots: • Lot 1a - Minor Coastal Civil Engineering Works. • Lot 1b - General Coastal Civil Engineering Works. • Lot 2 - Specialist beach management. Contractors may apply for any or all of the 3 lots. Each framework lot will be made up of a primary tier of up to 4 contractors and a secondary tier of up to 2 contractors. The secondary tier will primarily be used on a contingency resource basis. Stage 1 Application is via submission of a completed Procurement Selection Questionnaire (PSQ) by 14th August 2026 @ 12:00. The council anticipates shortlisting 8 contractors for each Lot from assessment of the returned PSQ submissions, who will then be invited to tender. The value of the framework across both lots is estimated to be in the region of £25M - £75m over six years. From previous spend, and future demand from SCG Members and with consideration of proposed EA General Works grant aid funding rule changes expected in April this year, we are estimating annual Framework usage and values to be the following, however there is no guarantee of this volume of work and actual volumes and spend may be higher or lower: Lot 1a - Estimated 10-20 call offs p/a, totalling £500k - £1m p/a Lot 1b - Estimated 5-10 call offs p/a, totalling £2m-£5m p/a Lot 2 - Estimated 5-10 call offs p/a, totalling £500k-£1m p/a The average value of works called off via the framework for each Lot by SCG and SCOPAC is likely to range from: • Lot 1a: £10k - £100k • Lot 1b: £250k - £5m • Lot 2: £50k - £1m However, there may also be commissions below £100k and on occasion in excess of £5m. Although it is unlikely that very high or very low value work will be procured via the agreement no upper or lower value constraints shall apply. CONTRACT TERMS The framework will be let using NEC4 Framework Contract with following call-off options as appropriate: • NEC4 ECC and ECSC • NEC4 TSC and TSSC • Standard Authority PO T&Cs for low value, low complex works. SCOPE Refer to individual Lot information section of notice for details. ESTABLISHMENT PROJECTS For lot 1a and lot 1b the framework will be establish based upon a scenario project(s). The Council may establish lot 2 upon either a scenario project(s) also OR a live project. This is to be confirmed at tender stage. LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW As part of the wider Local Government Review (LGR), the Council is required to actively engage in discussions with neighbouring authorities to explore potential opportunities for collaboration, shared service delivery, and governance alignment. While this engagement is ongoing, no formal decisions or agreements have been reached at this stage. Under current LGR proposals, it is likely to require Portsmouth City Council to form a new Authority by merging with other neighbouring Authorities. For Portsmouth, this will result in a new Council being created to provide the same services to everyone in the city, whilst covering a larger area and have a different name. Effectively all the current council services in the area of the new council boundary would be merged to create a new Council. The government has announced its decision on Local Government Reorganisation on Wednesday 25th March 2026 that Portsmouth City Council will become part of a larger unitary authority that will cover the areas of Gosport, Fareham and Havant, and include Newlands, Horndean, Clanfield and Rowlands Castle. The new unitary authority vesting date will be on 1st April 2028. In the event of reorganisation, contracts will include clauses that allow for the assignment of the contract to successor authorities. Any assignment clause is likely to state any contract may be assigned to any new authority that succeeds the original contracting authority. For further details in respect of LGR for the Council see the following link - https://www.portsmouth.gov.uk/services/council-and-democracy/devolution-and-plans-for- local-government-reorganisation/ For wider LGR information please refer to this link to the government page: Local government reorganisation: Policy and programme updates - GOV.UK
Scope
- Reference
- P00005192
- Total value
- £75,000,000 excluding VAT£90,000,000 including VATAbove the relevant threshold
- Commercial tool
- Standalone contract
- Contract dates
- 01 Mar 2027 to 28 Feb 2031Possible extension to 28 Feb 2033
The Framework contract will start as close to 1st March 2027 as possible and operate for an initial term of four years. Provision has been included for a framework extension of up to two years (taking the maximum framework duration to six years) to enable alignment with potential changes to the Environment Agency's funding programme and offers some resilience in the context of Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) and the potential for increased procurement demand in the early years of new authorities, but a need to continue to maintain sea defence assets. The two-year extension provision was openly included in the PME documentation shared with users and the market and no objections or concerns were raised through feedback received.
- Main category
- works
- CPV classifications
- 45111200451112104511123045111240451112504511210045112200451123004511236045112400451125004511260045112700451200004522350045232450452324514523316145233162452332004523325345243000452460004525212445252125
- Contract locations
- Brighton and Hove, United KingdomEast Sussex, United KingdomSouth East England, United KingdomSouth East England, United KingdomSouth East England, United KingdomSouth East England, United KingdomWiltshire, United Kingdom
- Particular suitability
- Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME)
Award criteria
Criteria the buyer will use to evaluate bids.
| Name | Description | Type | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | To be determined at tender stage, however the Cost element for each Lot will assess: • NEC4 fee percentages relevant to contract options applicable to each Lot, which could be multiple, that will be held for the Framework duration on a meet or beat basis No rates will be set as part of the Framework. | cost | 20.00% |
| Quality | It is anticipated that the 80% quality weighting at the second stage will be divided as follows across two assessment areas: • Technical Delivery (55%) Testing suppliers' approach to methodology, programme and resource against core scope requirements - achieved by using representative/typical hypothetical scenarios (and/or a live mini bid for Lot 2 but this is subject to final approvals); and • Framework Delivery (25%) Testing suppliers' approach and commitment to Framework delivery. However, these are subject to refinement of 5% in either direction on an overall cost/quality basis of 20/80 and would move proportionately if the overall tender cost/quality basis was to change up to 30/70. Full evaluation criteria will be defined upon the publication of the 2nd stage tender but will likely include the following themes and relative weightings for each of the quality assessment areas: • Technical delivery - using 3 equally weighted scenarios o Methodology (relative sub-weighting: 2) o Programme (relative sub-weighting: between 1 and 1.5) o Resource (relative sub-weighting: 1) • Framework delivery - across 5 equally weighted thematic areas o Framework management o Quality management o Supplier Resilience o Social Value (including Sustainability) o Health & Safety | quality | 80.00% |
| Cost | To be determined at tender stage, however the Cost element for each Lot will assess: • NEC4 fee percentages relevant to contract options applicable to each Lot, which could be multiple, that will be held for the Framework duration on a meet or beat basis • Contractual priced submission if live mini bid used No rates will be set as part of the Framework. It is currently subject to approvals if a live mini bid will be used at tender stage for Lot 2, but, if this is the case, it is likely that Lot 2 would be assessed on an overall cost/quality basis of 30/70 instead of 20/80 and not use any scenarios for qualitative assessment. Instead, the full quality weighting available for Technical Delivery would be used to assess quality of the live mini bid and the additional 10% allocated to cost would allow for assessment of a contractual price of the live mini bid alongside Framework fee percentages. | cost | 20.00% |
Participation
Conditions suppliers must meet to bid.
FINANCIAL CAPACITY Financial capacity (from core supplier submission) Pass/Fail Consortium/ Subcontracting Where a consortium and / or sub-contracting is being significantly relied upon during the framework & to deliver the contracts, consortium members / sub-contractors must complete this Question and each achieve a Pass in respect of the Business Risk Assessment and combined Turnover of all parties must meet the criteria set out below. Where a consortium and / or subcontractor is being relied upon to meet the financial capacity threshold, a direct contractual relationship in the form of a collateral warranty / Parent company Guarantee/ other contractual arrangement will be required as protection. Business Risk Assessment Pass Business risk score calculated using Credit Safe financial ratios of 50 or above Or Score of 49 or less - subject to provision of a guarantee, from either a parent company, consortium member or a financial guarantor, provision subject to the guarantor financial institution achieving a business risk assessment score of 50 or above Or Score of 49 or less or where a Credit Safe score cannot be accurately obtained and/or no guarantor is available, satisfactory assessment of financial information provided against the following key factors: acid test, liquidity, retained profit, CCJ instances, bankruptcies, invoice payment performance Fail: The response does not meet the criteria for a Pass. AND Turnover Assessment Latest turnover figures must be at least £500,000. If Tenderers are unable to meet the minimum turnover levels but feel that they are able to demonstrate alternative evidence of financial capacity they are instructed to submit this asap via request for clarification in order that the Council may consider the information and provide a decision that will be final. Where the contractor fails to meet the Turnover Assessment, Parent Company Guarantees may be considered where this allows them to meet the requirements. Insurance Pass / Fail Please confirm whether you already have, or can commit to obtain, prior to the award of the contract, the levels of insurance cover indicated below: • £10M Public Liability each & every claim • £5M Employers Liability each & every claim No Professional Indemnity is required although could be asked for at mini-competition stage if required for larger contracts.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE and contract examples - Pass / Fail and scored - 100% (Refer to 'Criteria used to select suppliers to tender for this lot' section) HEALTH & SAFETY - Pass / Fail • SSIP Approved Contractor (Any member scheme) • HSE Enforcement / Remedial Orders • Prosecution & Enforcement • HSE FFI Charges MODERN SLAVERY - Pass / Fail Confirmation that the bidder and any subcontractor they are relying on to satisfy the conditions of participation, is a 'relevant commercial organisation' and has a statement, policy, etc. in place that is compliant with Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 215, that can be provided upon request. Or Confirmation that the bidder is not a 'relevant commercial organisation' but still has OR can commit to having a statement, policy, etc. in place within 1 year of framework commencement, that is compliant with Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 215, that can be provided upon request. SUSTAINABILITY - Pass/Fail Confirmation that the Supplier has evidence of a sustainability policy (or equivalent).
Relevant experience - Pass / Fail and scored - 100% A minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 contract case studies relating to works completed or are currently being completed within the past 5 years must be submitted using the Contract Case Study template provided. Each Contract Case Study requires validation external to the Suppliers' organisation regarding the accuracy of information provided. Multiple case studies that apply to the same client organisation are permitted as long as each example relates to a discrete contract. The case studies will firstly be assessed holistically and must demonstrate evidence of meeting the Minimum requirements stated in this section to pass. Suppliers that pass the minimum requirements will then have their case studies scored, in accordance with the scoring methodology set out in the COP document. Experience Elements - Lot 1A Lot 1a Minimum Requirements (MR) - pass/fail MR1 At least 3 of the case studies must concern coastal works within a tidal area. MR2 At least 1 example of concrete repairs (examples could include but limited to spalled concrete or voiding) MR3 At least 1 example of sea defence timber repair (examples could range from plank replacement to new piles) MR4 At least 2 of the case studies must demonstrate experience delivering work packages with values ranging from £50,000 - £150,000. (If subcontracted as part of larger project, this value is for piece of work undertaken by your organisation) Lot 1a Additional Experience (AE) - scored AE1 Evidence of delivering rock works (for example rock gabions and placed rock armour) AE2 Evidence of delivering flood embankments placing impermeable materials to fixed levels AE3 Evidence of delivering flood gates, flood boards and demountable defences AE4 Evidence of delivering emergency flood and erosion works response. AE5 Evidence of delivering marine, harbour, and river works AE6 Evidence of delivering slipways, promenades, coastal steps and ramps
FINANCIAL CAPACITY Financial capacity (from core supplier submission) Pass/Fail Consortium/ Subcontracting Where a consortium and / or sub-contracting is being significantly relied upon during the framework & to deliver the contracts, consortium members / sub-contractors must complete this Question and each achieve a Pass in respect of the Business Risk Assessment and combined Turnover of all parties must meet the criteria set out below. Where a consortium and / or subcontractor is being relied upon to meet the financial capacity threshold, a direct contractual relationship in the form of a collateral warranty / Parent company Guarantee/ other contractual arrangement will be required as protection. Business Risk Assessment Pass Business risk score calculated using Credit Safe financial ratios of 50 or above Or Score of 49 or less - subject to provision of a guarantee, from either a parent company, consortium member or a financial guarantor, provision subject to the guarantor financial institution achieving a business risk assessment score of 50 or above Or Score of 49 or less or where a Credit Safe score cannot be accurately obtained and/or no guarantor is available, satisfactory assessment of financial information provided against the following key factors: acid test, liquidity, retained profit, CCJ instances, bankruptcies, invoice payment performance Fail: The response does not meet the criteria for a Pass. AND Turnover Assessment Latest turnover figures must be at least £8m If Tenderers are unable to meet the minimum turnover levels but feel that they are able to demonstrate alternative evidence of financial capacity they are instructed to submit this asap via request for clarification in order that the Council may consider the information and provide a decision that will be final. Where the contractor fails to meet the Turnover Assessment, Parent Company Guarantees may be considered where this allows them to meet the requirements. Insurance Pass / Fail Please confirm whether you already have, or can commit to obtain, prior to the award of the contract, the levels of insurance cover indicated below: • £10M Public Liability each & every claim • £5M Employers Liability each & every claim • £1m Professional Indemnity (Relating to claims or series of claims arising out of one event, which must be maintained for a period of 12 years after the defects period of the final works phase)
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE and contract examples - Pass / Fail and scored - 100% (Refer to 'Criteria used to select suppliers to tender for this lot' section) HEALTH & SAFETY - Pass / Fail • SSIP Approved Contractor (Any member scheme) • HSE Enforcement / Remedial Orders • Prosecution & Enforcement • HSE FFI Charges MODERN SLAVERY - Pass / Fail Confirmation that the bidder and any subcontractor they are relying on to satisfy the conditions of participation, is a 'relevant commercial organisation' and has a statement, policy, etc. in place that is compliant with Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 215, that can be provided upon request. Or Confirmation that the bidder is not a 'relevant commercial organisation' but still has OR can commit to having a statement, policy, etc. in place within 1 year of framework commencement, that is compliant with Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 215, that can be provided upon request. SUSTAINABILITY - Pass/Fail Evidence of ISO14001 (or equivalent) or working towards to have in place within 1 year of Framework start date. ACCREDITATIONS - Pass/Fail Evidence of ISO9001 (or equivalent) or working towards to have in place within 1 year of Framework start date. ABI performance bond - Info only Whilst not required to be held at Framework level, Suppliers on Lot 1b should be aware that an ABI Performance Bond of a value circa 10% of project value may be required for call-off contracts in excess of £5M. Any such requirement would be made clear in call-off documentation on a project specific basis.
Relevant experience - Pass / Fail and scored - 100% A minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 contract case studies relating to works completed or are currently being completed within the past 5 years must be submitted using the Contract Case Study template provided. Each Contract Case Study requires validation external to the Suppliers' organisation regarding the accuracy of information provided. Multiple case studies that apply to the same client organisation are permitted as long as each example relates to a discrete contract. The case studies will firstly be assessed holistically and must demonstrate evidence of meeting the Minimum requirements stated in this section to pass. Suppliers that pass the minimum requirements will then have their case studies scored, in accordance with the scoring methodology set out in the COP document. Experience Elements for LOT 1B Lot 1b Minimum Requirements (MR) - pass/fail MR1 - At least 3 of the case studies must be within a tidal area. MR2 - At least 1 example of asset refurbishment and/or replacement (i.e. returning an asset to its design performance or replacing like for like) MR3 - At least 1 example of a new open coast defence asset - examples could include but not limited to a new sea wall, groyne fields or multiple structures MR4 - At least 1 example of an estuary or harbour works - examples could include port works, jetties, flood walls, outfalls MR5 - At least 1 example of using NEC4 ECC - any option. MR6 - At least 2 of the case studies must demonstrate experience delivering contracts as Principal Contractor, as defined in CDM 2015, with values ranging from £250,000 - £5,000,000. (If subcontracted as part of larger project, this value is for piece of work undertaken by your organisation) Lot 1b Additional Experience (AE) - scored AE1 - Evidence of timber retaining for example, timber groynes & timber revetments AE2 - Evidence of precast and insitu concrete works to form seawalls or promenades AE3 - Evidence of delivering heavy graded rock armour work) AE4 - Evidence of delivering flood embankments placing impermeable materials to fixed levels AE5 - Evidence of delivering flood gates, flood boards and demountable defences AE6 - Evidence of delivering emergency flood and erosion works response and managing public safety AE7 - Evidence of delivering slipways, promenades, coastal steps and ramps AE8 - Evidence of realignment and habitat creation, where defences are removed to enable the sea to flood the land. AE9 - Evidence of Heritage works using approved conservation materials and methods. AE10 - Evidence of piling works, steel sheet or timber to provide a retaining structure.
FINANCIAL CAPACITY Financial capacity (from core supplier submission) Pass/Fail Consortium/ Subcontracting Where a consortium and / or sub-contracting is being significantly relied upon during the framework & to deliver the contracts, consortium members / sub-contractors must complete this Question and each achieve a Pass in respect of the Business Risk Assessment and combined Turnover of all parties must meet the criteria set out below. Where a consortium and / or subcontractor is being relied upon to meet the financial capacity threshold, a direct contractual relationship in the form of a collateral warranty / Parent company Guarantee/ other contractual arrangement will be required as protection. Business Risk Assessment Pass Business risk score calculated using Credit Safe financial ratios of 50 or above Or Score of 49 or less - subject to provision of a guarantee, from either a parent company, consortium member or a financial guarantor, provision subject to the guarantor financial institution achieving a business risk assessment score of 50 or above Or Score of 49 or less or where a Credit Safe score cannot be accurately obtained and/or no guarantor is available, satisfactory assessment of financial information provided against the following key factors: acid test, liquidity, retained profit, CCJ instances, bankruptcies, invoice payment performance Fail: The response does not meet the criteria for a Pass. AND Turnover Assessment Latest turnover figures must be at least £1,000,000. If Tenderers are unable to meet the minimum turnover levels but feel that they are able to demonstrate alternative evidence of financial capacity they are instructed to submit this asap via request for clarification in order that the Council may consider the information and provide a decision that will be final. Where the contractor fails to meet the Turnover Assessment, Parent Company Guarantees may be considered where this allows them to meet the requirements. Insurance Pass / Fail Please confirm whether you already have, or can commit to obtain, prior to the award of the contract, the levels of insurance cover indicated below: • £10M Public Liability each & every claim • £5M Employers Liability each & every claim No Professional Indemnity is required although could be asked for at mini-competition stage if required for larger contracts.
Relevant experience - Pass / Fail and scored - 100% A minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 contract case studies relating to works completed or are currently being completed within the past 5 years must be submitted using the Contract Case Study template provided. Each Contract Case Study requires validation external to the Suppliers' organisation regarding the accuracy of information provided. Multiple case studies that apply to the same client organisation are permitted as long as each example relates to a discrete contract. The case studies will firstly be assessed holistically and must demonstrate evidence of meeting the Minimum requirements stated in this section to pass. Suppliers that pass the minimum requirements will then have their case studies scored, in accordance with the scoring methodology set out in the COP document. Experience Elements for LOT 2 Lot 2 Minimum Requirements (MR) - pass/fail MR1 - At least 2 case studies must be coastal works demonstrating working and planning within the tidal cycle and its constraints . MR2 - At least 1 example of movement and placement of insitu beach materials for flood and coastal protection purposes. MR3 - At least 1 example of coastal ancillary works -clearance of and/or maintaining access for; outfalls, slipways, promenades, access steps or access ramps. MR4 - At least 1 example of safe management of the public in and around works using large construction equipment. MR5 - At least 2 of the case studies must demonstrate experience delivering contracts as Principal Contractor, as defined in CDM 2015, with values ranging from £50,000-£500k. (If subcontracted as part of larger project, this value is for piece of work undertaken by your organisation) Lot 2 Additional Experience (AE) - scored AE1 - Evidence of using NEC4 ECC/ESCS and/or TSC/TSSC - any option. AE2 - Evidence of excavation, haulage, deposition, profiling and screening of beach material for flood defence purposes. AE3 - Evidence of ground works associated with flood and coastal risk management AE4 - Evidence of undertaking emergency beach management works response to achieve a design beach profile - demonstrating ability to be agile and responding quickly and manage public safety. AE5 - Evidence of land-based importing of suitable beach material from external sources and transporting this to the beach face. AE6 - Evidence of delivering slipways, promenades, coastal steps and ramp beach clearance.
Submission & procedure
- Enquiry deadline
- 04 Aug 2026, 11:00 am
- Submission address
- https://in-tendhost.co.uk/portsmouthcc/aspx/Home Suppliers who are not already registered on the In-tend system will need to register their details in order to access the procurement documentation, raise clarification requests and return tender submissions. ↗
- Electronic submission
- Yes
- Procedure
- Competitive flexible procedure
Lots · 3 total
Divisions of the contract. Each lot can be awarded separately.
| Lot | Title | Est. value | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lot 1a - Minor Coastal & Flood Civil Engineering Works | £6.0m | active |
| 1b | Lot 1b - General Coastal & Flood Civil Engineering Works | £30.0m | active |
| 2 | Lot 2 - Specialist Beach Management Works | £6.0m | active |