Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How H and J Martin Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortH and J Martin Ltd(You)Kier ConstructionMeridiamLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDAtamis LtdG F Tomlinson Building Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | ME Meridiam Peer · rank #2 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #4 | GF G F Tomlinson Building Limited Peer · rank #5 | HA H and J Martin Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £2.0bn | £174.0m | £18.9m | £14.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £1.0m | £18.1m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.6bn | £2.0bn | £1.3bn | £73.4m | £155.2m | £10.4m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 36 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —