Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Crossling Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCrossling Ltd(You)Kier ConstructionSports and Leisure Management LtdJackson Civil Engineering LtdOverbury PlcCITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | SA Sports and Leisure Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | JC Jackson Civil Engineering Ltd Peer · rank #3 | OV Overbury Plc Peer · rank #4 | CP CITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CR Crossling Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.5bn | £53.5m | £29.1m | £16.8m | £1.7m | £37k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £135k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.7bn | £1.3bn | £133.4m | £238.4m | £149.2m | £5.5m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 7 | 31 | 17 | 6 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —