Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Killingley stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKillingley(You)Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure LtdWillmott Dixon Construction LimitedGRAHAMIntegrated Health ProjectsSACYR UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #1 | WD Willmott Dixon Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | GR GRAHAM Peer · rank #3 | IH Integrated Health Projects Peer · rank #4 | SU SACYR UK LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | KI Killingley (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.0bn | £4.2bn | £3.7bn | £3.7bn | £3.7bn | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £26.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £14.2bn | £11.8bn | £3.7bn | £3.8bn | £3.7bn | £2.0m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 40 | 3 | 1 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —