Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How C D Potter & Sons Ltd (Appointed to Lot 1) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 15 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortC D Potter & Sons Ltd (Appointed to Lot 1)(You)Speller MetcalfeMatthews and TannertAndrew Johnson Construction LtdALPHATRACK SYSTEMS LIMITEDCompass Developments (NE) Limited
iAuto-picked from 15 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SM Speller Metcalfe Peer · rank #1 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #2 | AJ Andrew Johnson Construction Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AS ALPHATRACK SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #5 | CD C D Potter & Sons Ltd (Appointed to Lot 1) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.4m | £7.1m | £6.8m | £6.2m | £663k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £631k | — | — | £2.5m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £485.3m | £207.7m | £6.8m | £60.3m | £72.2m | £19.2m(−73%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —