Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How R.G. Carter Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortR.G. Carter Limited(You)Kier ConstructionWillmott Dixon Construction LimitedLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDJohn Sisk and Son LtdM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | WD Willmott Dixon Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | RC R.G. Carter Limited (You) · target supplier | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £4.2bn | £174.0m | £14.0m(−99%) | £4.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £26.5m | £1.0m | — | — | £121.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £11.8bn | £1.3bn | £135.2m(−89%) | £271.7m | £121.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 40 | 9 | 4(−56%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —