Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Smith+Nephew PLC stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortSmith+Nephew PLC(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDNervecentre Software LtdHenry Boot Construction LimitedAlcidion UK LtdLYRECO UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | NS Nervecentre Software Ltd Peer · rank #2 | HB Henry Boot Construction Limited Peer · rank #3 | AU Alcidion UK Ltd Peer · rank #4 | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SM Smith+Nephew PLC (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £90.7m | £61.4m | £22.7m | £18.8m | £5.2m | £157k(−99%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | £107.3m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £170.8m | £775.5m | £18.8m | £353.7m | £32.6m(−91%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 28 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 29 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —