Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CDM Smith stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCDM Smith(You)ILIOSMorgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure LtdCostain LtdHOCHTIEF (UK) Construction LimitedFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IL ILIOS Peer · rank #1 | MS Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CO Costain Ltd Peer · rank #3 | H( HOCHTIEF (UK) Construction Limited Peer · rank #4 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CS CDM Smith (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £10.0bn | £5.0bn | £1.1bn | £981.7m | £10.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £71.8m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £10.0bn | £14.2bn | £3.9bn | £1.0bn | £247.2m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 37 | 18 | 1 | 19 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —