Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mars Chocolate stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMars Chocolate(You)Selecta U.K. LimitedTHIRSTY WORK LIMITEDCULLIGAN (UK) LIMITEDOptions Management LimitedI4C Vending Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SU Selecta U.K. Limited Peer · rank #1 | TW THIRSTY WORK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | C( CULLIGAN (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MC Mars Chocolate (You) · target supplier | OM Options Management Limited Peer · rank #5 | IV I4C Vending Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £143k | £108k | £88k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £14.4m | £7.0m | £7.5m | £7k(−100%) | £10.8m | £6.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 2 | 4 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —