Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Phil Parker stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPhil Parker(You)CHARANGA LIMITEDNORMANS (BURTON UPON TRENT) LIMITED59 suppliersVivedia Ltd trading as ObitusChamberlain Music
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CH CHARANGA LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | N( NORMANS (BURTON UPON TRENT) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PP Phil Parker (You) · target supplier | 5S 59 suppliers Peer · rank #4 | VL Vivedia Ltd trading as Obitus Peer · rank #5 | CM Chamberlain Music Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £70k | £50k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.3m | £781k | £438k(−44%) | £25.0m | £428k | £188k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —