Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CHAS D.ALLFLATT LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortCHAS D.ALLFLATT LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDTrading as GRAHAMG F Tomlinson Building LimitedDALKIA FACILITIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TA Trading as GRAHAM Peer · rank #3 | GF G F Tomlinson Building Limited Peer · rank #4 | DF DALKIA FACILITIES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CD CHAS D.ALLFLATT LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £174.0m | £29.4m | £14.1m | £80k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £1.0m | £1.9m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.6bn | £1.3bn | £102.6m | £155.2m | £20.7m | £2.8m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1(−75%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —