Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HILLS WASTE SOLUTIONS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South West.
Value band:
/
CohortHILLS WASTE SOLUTIONS LIMITED(You)ASPENS-SERVICES LIMITEDBidvest Noonan (UK) LimitedSuez Recycling and Recovery UK LtdRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa Recycling
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AS ASPENS-SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | BN Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited Peer · rank #2 | SR Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HW HILLS WASTE SOLUTIONS LIMITED (You) · target supplier | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.3m | £5.2m | £1.7m | £750k(−78%) | £300k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £89k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £8.3m | £38.9m | £974.1m | £12.6m(−51%) | £12.6m | £25.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 11 | 23 | 2(−80%) | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —