Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Tees Components Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTees Components Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDKier Integrated ServicesFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDSIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITEDWhitham Mills Engineering Ltd
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | KI Kier Integrated Services Peer · rank #2 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TC Tees Components Ltd (You) · target supplier | SM SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | WM Whitham Mills Engineering Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £221.1m | £15.1m | £10.5m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.0m | £1.7bn | £247.2m | £332k(−100%) | £2.1bn | £3.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 137 | 8 | 19 | — | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —