Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How T K Lynskey stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortT K Lynskey (You)H W MARTIN TRAFFICReconomy Group LimitedRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDN&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa Recycling
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HW H W MARTIN TRAFFIC Peer · rank #1 | RG Reconomy Group Limited Peer · rank #2 | TK T K Lynskey (You) · target supplier | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | NC N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £10.8m | £1.6m | £1.6m(+68%) | £300k | £0.03 | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £504.6m | £1.6m | £3.3m(−74%) | £12.5m | £11.3m | £24.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 1 | 1(−67%) | 2 | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —