Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Smith And Byford Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortSmith And Byford Limited(You)Willmott Dixon Construction LimitedLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDClegg Construction LimitedMorgan Sindall Construction and InfrastructureDALKIA FACILITIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WD Willmott Dixon Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CC Clegg Construction Limited Peer · rank #3 | MS Morgan Sindall Construction and Infrastructure Peer · rank #4 | SA Smith And Byford Limited (You) · target supplier | DF DALKIA FACILITIES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.2bn | £174.0m | £19.3m | £13.7m | £100k(−99%) | £80k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £26.5m | £1.0m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £11.8bn | £1.3bn | £305.7m | £13.7m | £129.2m(−58%) | £20.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 40 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 3(−25%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —