Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MICHAEL HYDE & ASSOCIATES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMICHAEL HYDE & ASSOCIATES LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDJohn Sisk and Son LtdOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDArcadis Consulting (UK) LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #2 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AC Arcadis Consulting (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | MH MICHAEL HYDE & ASSOCIATES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.9m | £4.6m | £340k | £65k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | £3.2m | £3.1m | — | £121.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £841.2m | £271.7m | £12.9m | £12.9m | £14.8m(−88%) | £121.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 143 | 1 | 5 | 3 | — | 5 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —