Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Tecomak stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTecomak(You)Artic Building Services LimitedS E Controls LimitedJLA LtdEmpire Air Conditioning Services LimitedMattair Maintenance Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AB Artic Building Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | SE S E Controls Limited Peer · rank #2 | JL JLA Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TE Tecomak (You) · target supplier | EA Empire Air Conditioning Services Limited Peer · rank #5 | MM Mattair Maintenance Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.3m | £660k | £125k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £336.6m | £660k | £22.0m | £32k(−97%) | £1.2m | £480k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 1 | 5 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —