Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How H.J. HAYWOOD AND SON LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortH.J. HAYWOOD AND SON LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionBALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITEDGalliford Try Building LimitedKier Integrated ServicesJohn Sisk and Son Ltd
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | BB BALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | GT Galliford Try Building Limited Peer · rank #3 | KI Kier Integrated Services Peer · rank #4 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | HH H.J. HAYWOOD AND SON LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £170.3m | £109.4m | £15.1m | £4.6m | £9k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £38.6m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £3.6bn | £1.4bn | £1.7bn | £271.7m | £881k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 36 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —