Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Thompson Dry Lining Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortThompson Dry Lining Ltd (You)Kier ConstructionWillmott Dixon Construction LimitedBowmer + Kirkland LimitedBAM Construction LtdTilbury Douglas
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | WD Willmott Dixon Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | B+ Bowmer + Kirkland Limited Peer · rank #3 | BC BAM Construction Ltd Peer · rank #4 | TD Tilbury Douglas Peer · rank #5 | TD Thompson Dry Lining Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £4.2bn | £660.0m | £408.3m | £318.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £26.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £11.8bn | £4.3bn | £2.6bn | £770.9m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 40 | 39 | 16 | 26 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —