Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How G. & M.J. Crouch & Son Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortG. & M.J. Crouch & Son Limited(You)M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITEDReconomy Group LimitedRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa RecyclingFCC Environment (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RG Reconomy Group Limited Peer · rank #2 | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | G& G. & M.J. Crouch & Son Limited (You) · target supplier | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #5 | FE FCC Environment (UK) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.4m | £1.6m | £300k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £123.3m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £125.7m | £1.6m | £12.6m | £2.5m(−90%) | £25.8m | £413.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 1 | 2 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —