Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How LAMBERT SMITH HAMPTON (CITY) LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLAMBERT SMITH HAMPTON (CITY) LIMITED(You)Mitie FM LimitedGalliford Try Construction LimitedSYNERGIZE LTDCLC Contractors LtdPennington Choices Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MF Mitie FM Limited Peer · rank #1 | GT Galliford Try Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | SY SYNERGIZE LTD Peer · rank #3 | CC CLC Contractors Ltd Peer · rank #4 | PC Pennington Choices Limited Peer · rank #5 | LS LAMBERT SMITH HAMPTON (CITY) LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £288.3m | £189.7m | £62.3m | £41.4m | £28.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £32k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.1bn | £1.9bn | £159.3m | £2.7bn | £208.6m | £276k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 11 | 6 | 18 | 24 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —