Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortMOTT MACDONALD LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionDeloitte LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPWhitemountain Quarries LtdJohn Sisk and Son Ltd
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | WQ Whitemountain Quarries Ltd Peer · rank #4 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £420.8m | £99.3m | £12.0m | £4.6m | £2.2m(−98%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £2.7m | £963k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £2.8bn | £1.8bn | £27.0m | £271.7m | £3.0m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 92 | 56 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —