Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How R&G Smith (Southern) Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortR&G Smith (Southern) Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdSaltash Enterprises LtdJoseph Woods Builders
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #3 | SE Saltash Enterprises Ltd Peer · rank #4 | RS R&G Smith (Southern) Ltd (You) · target supplier | JW Joseph Woods Builders Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.5m | £59.0m | £42.0m | £7.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £22k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £1.5bn | £521.8m | £265.8m | £36k(−100%) | £2.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 132 | 75 | 22 | 10 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —