Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Womble Bond Dickinson LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWomble Bond Dickinson LLP(You)Hogan Lovells International LLPDLA Piper UK LLPAshurstXEWLI LIMITEDSUSTENIC LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HL Hogan Lovells International LLP Peer · rank #1 | DP DLA Piper UK LLP Peer · rank #2 | AS Ashurst Peer · rank #3 | WB Womble Bond Dickinson LLP (You) · target supplier | XE XEWLI LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £13.9m | £6.1m | £6.0m | £222k(−96%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £55k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £89.0m | £108.6m | £221.4m | £4.2m(−95%) | £19.9m | £2.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 18 | 35 | 1(−94%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —