Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TETRA TECH CONSULTING LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortTETRA TECH CONSULTING LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDStiltz LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | ST Stiltz Limited Peer · rank #4 | TT TETRA TECH CONSULTING LIMITED (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.9m | £41.7m | £7.5m | £1.5m | £207k(−99%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | — | — | £121.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £841.2m | £522.7m | £97.3m | £2.1m | £207k(−100%) | £121.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 143 | 25 | 16 | 3 | 6(−63%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —