Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Burren & Whitaker stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBurren & Whitaker(You)Matthews and TannertOliveti Construction LimitedCreative Building SolutionsLexden Contracts LimitedT Loughman and Company Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #1 | OC Oliveti Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | B& Burren & Whitaker (You) · target supplier | CB Creative Building Solutions Peer · rank #4 | LC Lexden Contracts Limited Peer · rank #5 | TL T Loughman and Company Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.7m | £551k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £631k | — | — | — | — | £12k |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £207.7m | £80.8m | £150k(−97%) | £182k | £4.3m | £435k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 2 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —