Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MITCHELL CHARLESWORTH (SERVICES) LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMITCHELL CHARLESWORTH (SERVICES) LIMITED(You)KPMG LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPBDO LLPBlack & Veatch (U.K.) Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | BD BDO LLP Peer · rank #4 | MC MITCHELL CHARLESWORTH (SERVICES) LIMITED (You) · target supplier | B& Black & Veatch (U.K.) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £323.1m | £95.6m | £49.2m | £6.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £5.6m | £5.4m | £4.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £1.1bn | £1.7bn | £134.2m | £161k(−100%) | £12.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 65 | 55 | 38 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —