Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MPL stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMPL(You)Matthews and TannertPilon LimitedMulalley and Company LtdArcas Building solutions limitedTSQUARED P2 LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #1 | PI Pilon Limited Peer · rank #2 | MP MPL (You) · target supplier | MA Mulalley and Company Ltd Peer · rank #4 | AB Arcas Building solutions limited Peer · rank #5 | TP TSQUARED P2 LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.1m | £6.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £631k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £207.7m | £280.3m | £1.1m(−99%) | £254.0m | £3.6m | £20.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 4 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —