Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How K.J. SERVICES LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortK.J. SERVICES LTD(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDAZOOM TAXISMarlborough Highways LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITEDABC Supreme
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AT AZOOM TAXIS Peer · rank #2 | KS K.J. SERVICES LTD (You) · target supplier | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #4 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | AS ABC Supreme Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £56.6m | £1.3m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | £753k | — | — | £121.8m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £8.7m | £500k(−100%) | £451.1m | £121.8m | £5.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 76 | — | 2 | 5 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —