Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MWH Treatment Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMWH Treatment Limited(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDMace Consult LimitedVolkerFitzptrick LimitedHenry Boot Construction LimitedBreheny Civil Engineering
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | VO VolkerFitzptrick Limited Peer · rank #3 | HB Henry Boot Construction Limited Peer · rank #4 | BC Breheny Civil Engineering Peer · rank #5 | MT MWH Treatment Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £83.7m | £70.7m | £41.6m | £22.7m | £6.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | £2.6m | — | — | £95k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £738.3m | £707.2m | £775.5m | £246.5m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 27 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 29 | 1(−93%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —