Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M.A. FORSHAW LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM.A. FORSHAW LIMITED(You)OWEN TAYLOR AND SONS LIMITEDBFS Group T/A Bidvest FoodserviceON A ROLL SANDWICH COMPANY LIMITEDBrake Bros LtdNijjar Dairies Ltd T/a Freshways
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OT OWEN TAYLOR AND SONS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | BG BFS Group T/A Bidvest Foodservice Peer · rank #2 | MF M.A. FORSHAW LIMITED (You) · target supplier | OA ON A ROLL SANDWICH COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | BB Brake Bros Ltd Peer · rank #5 | ND Nijjar Dairies Ltd T/a Freshways Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.2m | £1.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £9.9m | £2.9m | — | £78.8m | £8.0m | £10.4m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £76.1m | £1.7bn | £5.4m(−94%) | £94.5m | £226.0m | £62.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —