Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MG Signs Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMG Signs Limited(You)CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITEDM J CHURCH (PLANT) LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedMarlborough Highways LimitedCore Control Solution
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MJ M J CHURCH (PLANT) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MS MG Signs Limited (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #4 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | CC Core Control Solution Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £11.1m | £10.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £2.0bn | — | £18.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £62.1m | £21.3bn | £2.8m(−99%) | £4.8bn | £451.1m | £46.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —