Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Q-Park Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortQ-Park Limited(You)Thomas Sinden LtdCAUSEWAY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITEDEDF Energy Customers LtdArcadis LLPEdge Public Services
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TS Thomas Sinden Ltd Peer · rank #1 | CT CAUSEWAY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | EE EDF Energy Customers Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #4 | EP Edge Public Services Peer · rank #5 | Q- Q-Park Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £258.9m | £15.1m | £6.9m | £6.6m | £109k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £53k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £665.3m | £30.3m | £10.9bn | £469.0m | £5.9m | £17.5m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —