Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How K M Beesley (Construction Services) Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortK M Beesley (Construction Services) Ltd(You)Kier ConstructionMatthews and TannertMulalley and Company LtdCOLEMAN & COMPANY LIMITEDLORNE STEWART PLC
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #2 | KM K M Beesley (Construction Services) Ltd (You) · target supplier | MA Mulalley and Company Ltd Peer · rank #4 | C& COLEMAN & COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | LS LORNE STEWART PLC Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £7.1m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £631k | — | — | £32k | £40.0m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £207.7m | £1.2m(−100%) | £254.0m | £86.4m | £343.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 10 | — | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —