Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ARCHER TECHNICOAT LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortARCHER TECHNICOAT LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDIpsos (Market Research) LtdFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDBMG RESEARCH LTDInseego UK LTD (formerly C Track LTD)
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | I( Ipsos (Market Research) Ltd Peer · rank #2 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | BR BMG RESEARCH LTD Peer · rank #4 | AT ARCHER TECHNICOAT LIMITED (You) · target supplier | U Inseego UK LTD (formerly C Track LTD) Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £22.3m | £10.4m | £1.9m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £2.6m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £107.3m | £247.2m | £31.6m | — | £28.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 38 | 18 | 12 | 1(−96%) | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —