Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ARCHER TECHNICOAT LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortARCHER TECHNICOAT LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDBMG RESEARCH LTDInseego LtdFortius VA Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BR BMG RESEARCH LTD Peer · rank #3 | AT ARCHER TECHNICOAT LIMITED (You) · target supplier | IN Inseego Ltd Peer · rank #5 | FV Fortius VA Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £224.7m | £10.5m | £1.7m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £247.2m | £30.8m | — | £28.0m | £3.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 136 | 21 | 13 | 1(−95%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —