Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How THE HUNNABALL FAMILY FUNERAL GROUP LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTHE HUNNABALL FAMILY FUNERAL GROUP LIMITED(You)Facultatieve Technologies LtdGreater Manchester FuneralsNottinghamshire Funeral Services LtdFuneral Services Ltd T/A Co-op FuneralcareManor House Funeral Services Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FT Facultatieve Technologies Ltd Peer · rank #1 | TH THE HUNNABALL FAMILY FUNERAL GROUP LIMITED (You) · target supplier | GM Greater Manchester Funerals Peer · rank #3 | NF Nottinghamshire Funeral Services Ltd Peer · rank #4 | FS Funeral Services Ltd T/A Co-op Funeralcare Peer · rank #5 | MH Manor House Funeral Services Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1m | £78k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £70.4m | £80k(−95%) | £920k | £1.5m | £1.9m | £1.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 3 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —