Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How T Loughman & Co Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortT Loughman & Co Ltd(You)Kier ConstructionLOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITEDG F Tomlinson Building LimitedOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDArcadis Consulting (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | LP LOVELL PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | GF G F Tomlinson Building Limited Peer · rank #3 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AC Arcadis Consulting (UK) Limited Peer · rank #5 | TL T Loughman & Co Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £174.0m | £14.1m | £688k | £323k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £3.2m | £3.1m | £12k(−100%) |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.6bn | £1.3bn | £155.2m | £13.2m | £13.1m | £20.2m(−87%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 5 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —