Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How RYDER ARCHITECTURE LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North East.
Value band:
/
CohortRYDER ARCHITECTURE LIMITED(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdArcadis LLPPellings LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #4 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #5 | RA RYDER ARCHITECTURE LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £84.8m | £59.0m | £41.7m | £6.6m | £1.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | £22k | — | £53k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £1.5bn | £522.0m | £469.0m | £148.4m | £45.6m(−91%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 29 | 79 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 3(−87%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —