Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MITSUBISHI PENCIL CO. U.K. LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 13 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortMITSUBISHI PENCIL CO. U.K. LTD(You)Banner Group LtdLYRECO UK LIMITEDBATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDAntalisCOMCEN COMPUTER SUPPLIES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 13 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BG Banner Group Ltd Peer · rank #1 | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #3 | AN Antalis Peer · rank #4 | MP MITSUBISHI PENCIL CO. U.K. LTD (You) · target supplier | CC COMCEN COMPUTER SUPPLIES LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £22.0m | £4.6m | £3.1m | £70k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £640.7m | £358.1m | £427.4m | £18.1m | £2.9m(−99%) | £15.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 47 | 34 | 25 | 5 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —