Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MHP COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMHP COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDERNST & YOUNG LLPAllied Publicity Services (Manchester) LtdIDENTITY EVENTS MANAGEMENT LIMITEDScroll Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #2 | AP Allied Publicity Services (Manchester) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | IE IDENTITY EVENTS MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | SC Scroll Ltd Peer · rank #5 | MC MHP COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.0m | £106.6m | £22.3m | £2.0m | £33k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £15.0m | £5.4m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £1.8bn | £482.1m | £21.5m | £12.2m | £400k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 135 | 60 | 11 | 3 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —