Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Evonik Corporation stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEvonik Corporation(You)Hippo Digital LimitedPUBLIC Group International LtdNeurodegeneration Initiative LtdCerca Magnetics LimitedARCTEC JV (AtkinsRéalis UK Limited and Createc Ltd.)
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #1 | PG PUBLIC Group International Ltd Peer · rank #2 | NI Neurodegeneration Initiative Ltd Peer · rank #3 | CM Cerca Magnetics Limited Peer · rank #4 | EV Evonik Corporation (You) · target supplier | AJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £23.9m | £3.3m | £2.9m | £2.8m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £40.4m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £406.1m | £13.5m | £2.9m | £3.9m | — | £5.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —