Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Hope & Clay (Construction) Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortHope & Clay (Construction) Ltd(You)Galliford Try Construction LimitedCONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedMarlborough Highways LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GT Galliford Try Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | CC CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | H& Hope & Clay (Construction) Ltd (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #4 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.1m | £403k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £2.0bn | — | £123.3m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.1bn | £62.1m | £13.5m(−97%) | £4.8bn | £451.1m | £123.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 2 | — | 1 | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —