Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How VICTORIA GRANT LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortVICTORIA GRANT LIMITED(You)Banner Group LtdBATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDSMI INT GROUP LIMITEDWM. NORTHAM & COMPANY LIMITEDHealthy Bean Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BG Banner Group Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #2 | SI SMI INT GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | VG VICTORIA GRANT LIMITED (You) · target supplier | WN WM. NORTHAM & COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HB Healthy Bean Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £26.0m | £7.3m | £90k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £750k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £640.6m | £426.9m | £21.2m | £2.3m(−97%) | £18.6m | £76.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 47 | 24 | 3 | 3(−78%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —