Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Meteor Communications stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortMeteor Communications(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDCarbon60 LtdI3Works Ltd.Wessex Petroleum Ltd T/A WP Group
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CA Carbon60 Ltd Peer · rank #3 | I3 I3Works Ltd. Peer · rank #4 | WP Wessex Petroleum Ltd T/A WP Group Peer · rank #5 | MC Meteor Communications (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £308.8m | £292.6m | £18.6m | £3.1m | £2.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £703k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £5.6bn | £242.1m | £75.5m | £244.2m | £3.9m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 54 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1(−50%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —