Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Trak Systems Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTrak Systems Ltd(You)Medequip Assistive Technology LtdBATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDWagstaff Interiors GroupFMS Interior Services LimitedDams
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #2 | WI Wagstaff Interiors Group Peer · rank #3 | FI FMS Interior Services Limited Peer · rank #4 | DA Dams Peer · rank #5 | TS Trak Systems Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.5m | £7.3m | £856k | £136k | £42k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £750k | £750k | — | £750k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £822.4m | £426.9m | £59.4m | £31.1m | £48.6m | £1.2m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 24 | 8 | 4 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —