Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Total Pool Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortTotal Pool Ltd(You)Schofield & SonsPlaces for People LeisureMainmark Ground Engineering (UK) LtdPool Tech ServicesArcus Products Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | S& Schofield & Sons Peer · rank #1 | TP Total Pool Ltd (You) · target supplier | PF Places for People Leisure Peer · rank #3 | MG Mainmark Ground Engineering (UK) Ltd Peer · rank #4 | PT Pool Tech Services Peer · rank #5 | AP Arcus Products Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.9m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £235.3m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £8.8m | £183k(−32%) | £235.3m | £270k | £217k | £148k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | — | 1 | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —