Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Butterfly Conservation stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortButterfly Conservation(You)OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDMITIE LIMITEDRSK Environment LtdRICARDO-AEA LIMITEDBUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MI MITIE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #3 | RI RICARDO-AEA LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | BD BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | BC Butterfly Conservation (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £80.0m | £5.5m | £5.2m | £3.2m | £672k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.0m | — | — | £185k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £536.1m | £472.9m | £93.4m | £150.1m | £24.9m | £743k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 124 | 10 | 16 | 39 | 10 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —