Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Managing for Quality Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortManaging for Quality Ltd(You)Cognizant Worldwide LtdPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPLA InternationalL.A. INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER CONSULTANTS LIMITED (01633646)GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CW Cognizant Worldwide Ltd Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | LI LA International Peer · rank #3 | LI | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #5 | MF Managing for Quality Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £205.3m | £90.7m | £52.9m | £40.7m | £13.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £11.3m | £5.6m | — | £10.0m | £4.8m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.0bn | £1.4bn | £427.2m | £90.0m | £243.7m | £244k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 21 | 62 | 18 | 11 | 60 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —