Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How INTEGRAL SERVICES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortINTEGRAL SERVICES LIMITED(You)Thomas Sinden LtdAIREDALE CATERING EQUIPMENT LIMITEDAnetic Aid LimitedHATHERLEY COMMERCIAL SERVICES LIMITEDHatherley Commercial Serviced Ltd
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TS Thomas Sinden Ltd Peer · rank #1 | AC AIREDALE CATERING EQUIPMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AA Anetic Aid Limited Peer · rank #3 | IS INTEGRAL SERVICES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | HC HATHERLEY COMMERCIAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HC Hatherley Commercial Serviced Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £258.9m | £1.0m | £454k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £665.3m | £7.3m | £43.1m | — | £5.8m | £550k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1(−67%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —